Every six years, some of the world’s top scientific thinkers comprehensively assess what is known about climate change. The end result is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. Several CSIRO scientists are among the lead authors.

Every six years, some of the world’s top scientific thinkers comprehensively assess what is known about climate change. The end result is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report. Several CSIRO scientists are among the lead authors.

The IPCC reports have been described as perhaps the most heavily scrutinised documents in the history of science. Each report takes several years of work. The latest report on climate science involved multiple phases of review, and more than 50,000 comments from reviewers.

“The scientists that agree to volunteer their time to be part of this effort are people that are pretty committed, and they include some of the best climate scientists in the world,” says Dr Steve Rintoul, a coordinating lead author of the chapter on oceans, and a CSIRO research team leader.

Dr Rintoul led a team of more than a dozen people to draft the oceans chapter.

“So the meetings, when we do actually all meet up face to face, are extraordinary. It’s a wonderful experience to be really thinking through as clearly as we can what we know about climate change.”

portrait of man with sea in background

Dr Steve Rintoul

Ocean observations

Dr Rintoul is a Hobart-based expert on the Southern Ocean, focusing on how and why the Southern Ocean is changing, and the consequences.

The IPCC report assesses what the latest science says about changes in Southern Ocean temperatures, salinities and oxygen concentrations.

“The results from our group and from others show that the Southern Ocean is warming, and it’s warming more rapidly than the global average rate of warming in the ocean,” he says.

Dr Rintoul says the main way that the oceans influence climate is by storing vast amounts of heat and carbon dioxide. If the ocean becomes less effective at soaking up heat and carbon dioxide, the climate changes more rapidly.

“That’s a type of a feedback, and part of our work in the Southern Ocean is trying to determine how likely these feedbacks are, how strong they might be, and therefore how rapidly climate is going to evolve in the coming decades and centuries to come,” he says.

Dr John Church

Dr John Church, Climate Scientist, and sea levels specialist, with Oceans Atlas, CSIRO Hobart. photo by Bruce Miller 3/2006

Dr John Church

Sea-level change

Dr John Church is a Hobart-based CSIRO researcher and coordinating lead author of a team of more than a dozen people, for the chapter on sea-level change. He is a past recipient of the Eureka Prize for Scientific Research and a member of the IPCC team that shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize.

A significant finding in his chapter is a clearer understanding of what has caused sea-level rise.

“This is the first IPCC report where we have an adequate explanation for the observed 20th century sea-level rise,” he says.

His chapter provides estimates of future sea-level rise, depicting scenarios with and without mitigation of greenhouse gases.

Dr Church says the most difficult challenge was consideration of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Of critical importance is what is known as the Greenland threshold ‑ the point at which warmer temperatures result in surface melting of ice sheets that is increasing more rapidly than the increase in precipitation.

The exact value of that threshold remains uncertain, Dr Church says. It is somewhere between one and four degrees Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures.

The water locked up in the Greenland ice sheet is equivalent to about seven metres of sea-level rise, although it would take centuries for it to melt.

“For our higher greenhouse gas emissions we could be approaching that threshold or even crossing that threshold late in the 21st century,” he says. “That doesn’t mean sea levels will rise by seven metres during the 21st century, but if we maintain high temperatures we’re committing the world to larger sea levels.”

Dr Rintoul adds that sea levels have been rising more rapidly in the past 20 years than the average over the past century.

“The frequency of flooding events will increase,” he says. “So what used to be a one-in-100-years flood will become one-in-10 years, or what was a one-in-10 years flood will happen every year.”

Portrait of man in office

Dr Pep Canadell

Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles

Dr Pep Canadell is a lead author on the carbon cycle and budget chapter, and a CSIRO senior research scientist based in Canberra. He was also recognised for the part played in the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to the IPCC in 2007.

His chapter focuses on the long-term perspective – taking an historical look at emissions and the industrial era going back to 1750. He draws on this to bring together the global carbon budget – combining the three main greenhouse gases contributing to global warming: carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide.

Dr Canadell says a key factor driving the concentration of greenhouse gases is natural sinks – mostly the ocean and vegetation – which remove more than half the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

“This is like having a contract with nature for a 50 per cent discount on climate change,” he says.

It is critical to understand the dynamic of these natural sinks in the future, to ensure they continue to perform this function.

“It is very important to understand that climate change is like a global problem in the sense that the atmosphere is common for society,” he says. “What we Australians do or somebody else does at the other end of the world actually all gets mixed within a year.”

It is an incredible honour, Dr Canadell says, to work in a team with other top scientists and contribute to the IPCC process – but also very demanding.

“The whole process is about five years, since the inception of putting the teams together, the structure of the new assessment, and bringing the people together,” he says. “Then there’s a very intense three years in which there’s a number of meetings where authors come together to actually work and do the actual writing.”

An unexpected challenge was the review process.

“It seems that everyone in the world knows a lot about carbon cycles,” he says. “It’s a chapter that received the most number of comments – almost 10,000 … You need to address every single comment.”

Dr Church agrees the process was very challenging, with some very difficult issues to consider.

“But also it’s very rewarding when the final report is produced and it’s acknowledged, and people look at it and it has an impact in the world.”

What’s to come?

Five CSIRO scientists have been involved in the Working Group Two report, on Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, to be released in March 2014. They are Dr Kathleen McInnes, an expert on the coastal impacts of climate change; Dr Mark Howden, an expert on climate change and agriculture; Dr Francis Chiew, an expert on hydrological science and modelling; Dr Penny Whetton, an expert on regional climate change; and Dr Elvira Poloczanska, an expert on climate change ecology.

Video: Understanding why our Earth system is warming

Dr Steve Rintoul, Dr John Church and Dr Pep Canadell of CSIRO discuss our climate science research to understand how and why the Earth system is warming.



  1. “The frequency of flooding events will increase,” he says. “So what used to be a one-in-100-years flood will become one-in-10 years, or what was a one-in-10 years flood will happen every year.”

    Over past years, various CSIRO experts have done a disservice to their cause by consistently over-stating potential alarming outcomes from AGW. I was therefore disappointed to see yet another unsubstantiated claim (see above) in your post. How can you justify such a statement, particularly when there is plenty evidence to suggest that Worldwide climatic “events” such as hurricanes, flooding etc have remained within long term boundary limits. Present your evidence but stay away from alarmism……please.

  2. Is it possible that the computer model projections are not accurately representing the ACTUAL effect of [CO2] because they are confounding them with the effect of water vapor? Almost all of the model projections are too high so it leads one to conclude that the underlying science may not be exact…
    In the video, the “reasons” given were long on opinion and short on numbers.
    I am loathe to spend my tax dollars on something that will not have any effect on the problem (such as it is). The Summary for Policymakers seems to have strayed from the WG data and conclusions ( more confidence even though the actual projections are LESS clear).
    I am not convinced that there is a problem but especially that the science can provide us with an accurate prescription for what apparently will ail us.

  3. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/columnists/the-world-is-warming-but-theres-no-need-to-panic/story-fni1hfs5-1226731120767
    This is a very sensible article by Bjorn Lomburg…
    Renewable energy in its present forms- solar and wind- cannot supply base-load electricity at reasonable costs. That is why Government distortions of the market are necessary to validate them. Why does the CSIRO not advocate 4th Generation nuclear power – Integral fast Reactors- or Thorium reactors? You must surely be aware of these new technologies…

    1. Hi Kevin, CSIRO is researching a wide range of possible scenarios for Australia’s energy future. You might be interested in this article by the Director of our Energy Flagship discussing this research: http://theconversation.com/what-will-australias-energy-future-look-like-16412
      Or you can explore possible energy scenarios for the future at http://www.efuture.csiro.au/
      Nuclear research in Australia is undertaken by ANSTO – http://www.ansto.gov.au/

Commenting on this post has been disabled.