Carbon capture has been in the news a lot recently, but what exactly is it? Never fear, we're here to help explain this technical topic (using chocolate!).
We’re researching a broad portfolio of energy technologies to ensure we can keep the lights on, remain economically competitive and importantly, lower emissions. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one key solution, and our researchers are on the case.
But what exactly is CCS? How does it work? What can it achieve? How can I sound super-smart when I’m with my friends and the topic comes up? Never fear, we gentle science folk are here to help give you the scoop on this technical topic (including the best kind of analogy: a chocolate-based one).
How does it work?
CCS is a process used to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) gas emitted while producing power or making materials such as steel, cement or fertiliser. Broadly speaking, the gas is captured, transported, and then safely stored underground – permanently. By doing this, we can typically capture 90 per cent of the CO2 that would otherwise be emitted from power stations and industrial facilities.
Energy from fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas is released in the combustion (burning) and conversion process, which also results in the emission of CO2 as a by-product. It’s possible to capture the gas before it is emitted, and we’re working at Victoria’s AGL Loy Yang Power Station to make the capture process more efficient.
CO2 is transported by pipeline, truck, rail or ship. In fact, there are already many pipelines around the world that safely transport large amounts of CO2 every day.
The gas also has many uses in the food and beverage industry (like creating the bubbles in your soft drink!) and it can assist with industrial processes such as the recovery of oil from underground. Of course, there’s only so much soft drink we can consume, so we also need to think about what to do with the remaining CO2.
Once CO2 has been captured and transported, it is injected deep underground, usually at depths of over 1 km. This process is sometimes called ‘geosequestration’. Generally, the rock needs three features to be suitable:
- Sufficient pore spaces in which CO2can be contained (porosity)
- Pathways connecting the pore spaces for the CO2to move through (permeability)
- A solid, sealing layer of rock on top of the porous, permeable layer, to stop the CO2moving outside the target area (seal or ‘cap rock’).
Here’s a delicious example of why these geological features are important.
Let’s consider a Tim Tam and an Aero Bar as two possible types of reservoir rock and milk as our CO2. Both chocolate bars have plenty of porous space in them, yet if you bite an end off each and try to use them as a straw through which to draw milk, the permeability of the Tim Tam will allow the milk to be pulled through the porous spaces into your mouth, but the Aero bar won’t.
This is because the Aero Bar, although porous, does not have any channels connecting the spaces and therefore the milk cannot move through the chocolate. The principle is the same for the reservoir rock needed to store CO2. The CO2 needs to be able to move through the rock and fill all the porous spaces.
Storage of CO2 has safely happened around the world for many years, and we’re finessing the finer points at our National Geosequestration Laboratory.
In addition to limiting the emissions expended to power our homes, CCS can play a vital role in decarbonising energy-intensive industries (such as steel production) which involve the continued use of fossil fuels. If fossil fuel is replaced by biomass, applying CCS will actually start to directly reduce the CO2 levels in the atmosphere, demonstrating its large potential for climate change mitigation.
While we’re working on making these technologies more efficient and cost effective, a number of major CCS projects are already operating or being built, capturing and storing many million tonnes of CO2 per year.
23rd February 2017 at 5:32 pm
What a waste of money! CCS is hellish expensive and dearer than solar energy. Clean coal? Isn’t that an oxymoron?
23rd February 2017 at 5:21 pm
The CO2 from the coal we are mining should be shown by CSIRO in terms of the volume of bubbly water needed to dissolve it ….what size ocean I wonder? CO2 is only 27% carbon by weight. Water will dissolve 3.5% CO2 maximum by volume which corresponds to 1.3% carbon by weight. 431 million tons of coal were mined in Australia last year, corresponding to 300 million tons of carbon. To dissolve that at 3.5% would require 8.6 thousand million tons of water(8.6×10**9). That is about 15 Sidney Harbors full -each year! This of course ignores the carbon and dollar costs of extracting the carbon and the capital cost of the plant required to pump all this stuff.
So, what do I think? I think CSIRO have been “persuaded” to make this look like a piece of cake to keep them funded.
23rd February 2017 at 4:51 pm
Will CO2 become the new landfill?
23rd February 2017 at 4:45 pm
Sponsored by the “Clean” Coal lobby! Renewables are far, far cheaper than coal + CSS will ever be.
23rd February 2017 at 3:50 pm
This is brilliant. You need to communicate much more about this. Coal is cheap and plentiful and if it could be used to generate power without generating emissions this would provide enormous benefit to everyone and especially those most disadvantaged
23rd February 2017 at 4:33 pm
What nonsense. So sad, to see this rubbish from a science organisation. Perhaps the CSIRO hasn’t heard that CO2 levels are rising at 3 ppm each year and the rate is increasing. It’s all academic anyway, we can’t survive the consequences which are not that far away.
23rd February 2017 at 9:45 pm
What? Coal is now more expensive than renewables for providing electricity, and if you just read this, everything that’s explained above just adds more (heaps more) costs to the process of converting carbon into heat to make energy. And it is not emissions free. And the CO2 will leak.