All evidence suggests that the tag had been eaten by another white shark.
White shark

The white shark grin. She definitely knows something we don’t. Image: Flickr / Pterantula

Sometimes the internet goes a little crazy with quirky, fantastical, scary stories. Take for example the recent hoax, ‘huge sting ray attacks man’, which turned out to be a great video of a man diving around the shadow of a kite.

So, what can we make of the mysterious discovery of a CSIRO shark tag washed up on a beach that had some fairly typical data recorded on it? Some are incorrectly interpreting the data and speculating that this is evidence of the existence of a megalodon, an ancient extinct species of shark that lived millions of year ago. The megalodon was huge, around 15-24 metres in length… eek. White sharks grow up to 6 m in length.

People want to know the truth about the shark-eating-shark, so here it is.


An artist rendering of a megalodon.

In late 2003 we tagged a white shark approximately 3m in length off south-west Western Australia with a tag that collects data on swim depth, water temperature and light levels. The tag records data at regular intervals against a date/time stamp. The tag was programmed to release from the shark on a pre-programmed date, float to the surface and transmit the data collected back to us via satellite. These ‘archival’ tags are commercially produced and are in common use by researchers around the world.

The tag surfaced approximately two weeks earlier than programmed, in early 2004. This is not unusual. It washed ashore near Esperance, WA and was returned to us.

When we looked at its data there was a period of approximately three weeks just before the tag surfaced where the temperature recorded was higher than the surrounding sea, but where the tag continued to ‘dive’ in a pattern consistent with a white shark. During this time, the tag failed to record light. Data before and after suggest the tag was functioning normally. The temperature recorded for these three weeks was consistent with that of the core body temperature of a white shark but too low for something like a killer whale.

At one point the tagged shark dived to a depth of 570 m – this is not unusual for white sharks – it is normal behaviour. This dive took place about one week prior to the tag recording the higher temperatures (not immediately before as some have reported) and the two events are not related.

All evidence suggests that the tag had been eaten by another white shark.

We have seen white sharks biting each other before, sometimes removing pieces of tissue in the process. We concluded that this was the most likely explanation – One shark bit off a little more than he could chew and ended up swallowing the tag.

We never concluded that the 3m shark was consumed by another much larger shark.

And that folks, is the truth.

White shark fast facts:

  • A common mistake people make is calling these awesome creatures, ‘Great White Sharks’, it’s actually just ‘white shark’ (Carcharodon carcharias). But we still think they’re still pretty great.
  • Sharks play a vital ecosystem role as top predators. Declines in top predators can cascade through the food web, seeing some species groups increase while eliminating others.
  • We have one of the most comprehensive white shark research programs in the world, with over 250 tagged white sharks in Australian waters.
  • Our tagging program provides us with a good idea of migration patterns – we know for example that there is an East and a Southwest population.
  • We tag these beauties in a very humane way – in a sling, in the water:
    • The white shark is listed as vulnerable and migratory under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
    • We are working with government and other partners to find out the population of white sharks in the east and southwest of Australia, we’re using tagging, aerial surveys and DNA analysis and advanced statistics.

Click bait

Head over to our website for more shark facts.


  1. As understand it, It is not possible for a Giant squid to have done it. Because the satellite device mounted on the 3 meter white shark. Was to big to go through the beacon or mouth of a giant squid. Most likely another white shark took a chunk of the smaller white shark. The dive was consistent with how a white shark dives. The deepest depth the satellite recorded after the device was taken (based on the temperature change) was a little over 500 meters – which is consistent with a white shark. But the ocean and science can of course always through us a side curve of new discoveries. But Kraken is unlikely… 😉

  2. It’s frightening how the media and supposedly reputable sources of scientific research like Discovery and the Smithsonian took this speculative nonsense to the bank. It’s sad, too.

  3. Excuse me mate, I’ve got this thing stuck in my back that’s itching me. Reckon you could nip it off?

Commenting on this post has been disabled.