Could this be the way to fill up in future?
Hydrogen could become a significant part of Australia’s energy landscape within the coming decade, competing with both natural gas and batteries, according to our new roadmap for the industry.
Hydrogen gas is a versatile energy carrier with a wide range of potential uses. However, hydrogen is not freely available in the atmosphere as a gas. It therefore requires an energy input and a series of technologies to produce, store and then use it.
Why would we bother? Because hydrogen has several advantages over other energy carriers, such as batteries. It is a single product that can service multiple markets and, if produced using low- or zero-emissions energy sources, it can help us significantly cut greenhouse emissions.
The benefits are potentially even greater for heavy vehicles such as buses and trucks which already carry heavy payloads, and where lengthy battery recharge times can affect the business model.
Hydrogen can also play an important role in energy storage, which will be increasingly necessary both in remote operations such as mine sites, and as part of the electricity grid to help smooth out the contribution of renewables such as wind and solar. This could work by using the excess renewable energy (when generation is high and/or demand is low) to drive hydrogen production via electrolysis of water. The hydrogen can then be stored as compressed gas and put into a fuel cell to generate electricity when needed.
Australia is heavily reliant on imported liquid fuels and does not currently have enough liquid fuel held in reserve. Moving towards hydrogen fuel could potentially alleviate this problem. Hydrogen can also be used to produce industrial chemicals such as ammonia and methanol, and is an important ingredient in petroleum refining.
Further, as hydrogen burns without greenhouse emissions, it is one of the few viable green alternatives to natural gas for generating heat.
Our roadmap predicts that the global market for hydrogen will grow in the coming decades. Among the prospective buyers of Australian hydrogen would be Japan, which is comparatively constrained in its ability to generate energy locally. Australia’s extensive natural resources, namely solar, wind, fossil fuels and available land lend favourably to the establishment of hydrogen export supply chains.
Why embrace hydrogen now?
Given its widespread use and benefit, interest in the “hydrogen economy” has peaked and troughed for the past few decades. Why might it be different this time around? While the main motivation is hydrogen’s ability to deliver low-carbon energy, there are a couple of other factors that distinguish today’s situation from previous years.
Our analysis shows that the hydrogen value chain is now underpinned by a series of mature technologies that are technically ready but not yet commercially viable. This means that the narrative around hydrogen has now shifted from one of technology development to “market activation”.
The solar panel industry provides a recent precedent for this kind of burgeoning energy industry. Large-scale solar farms are now generating attractive returns on investment, without any assistance from government. One of the main factors that enabled solar power to reach this tipping point was the increase in production economies of scale, particularly in China. Notably, China has recently emerged as a proponent for hydrogen, earmarking its use in both transport and distributed electricity generation.
But whereas solar power could feed into a market with ready-made infrastructure (the electricity grid), the case is less straightforward for hydrogen. The technologies to help produce and distribute hydrogen will need to develop in concert with the applications themselves.
A roadmap for hydrogen
In light of this, the primary objective of our National Hydrogen Roadmap is to provide a blueprint for the development of a hydrogen industry in Australia. With several activities already underway, it is designed to help industry, government and researchers decide where exactly to focus their attention and investment.
Our first step was to calculate the price points at which hydrogen can compete commercially with other technologies. We then worked backwards along the value chain to understand the key areas of investment needed for hydrogen to achieve competitiveness in each of the identified potential markets. Following this, we modelled the cumulative impact of the investment priorities that would be feasible in or around 2025.
What became evident from the report was that the opportunity for clean hydrogen to compete favourably on a cost basis with existing industrial feedstocks and energy carriers in local applications such as transport and remote area power systems is within reach. On the upstream side, some of the most material drivers of reductions in cost include the availability of cheap low emissions electricity, utilisation and size of the asset.
The development of an export industry, meanwhile, is a potential game-changer for hydrogen and the broader energy sector. While this industry is not expected to scale up until closer to 2030, this will enable the localisation of supply chains, industrialisation and even automation of technology manufacture that will contribute to significant reductions in asset capital costs. It will also enable the development of fossil-fuel-derived hydrogen with carbon capture and storage, and place downward pressure on renewable energy costs dedicated to large scale hydrogen production via electrolysis.
In light of global trends in industry, energy and transport, development of a hydrogen industry in Australia represents a real opportunity to create new growth areas in our economy. Blessed with unparalleled resources, a skilled workforce and established manufacturing base, Australia is extremely well placed to capitalise on this opportunity. But it won’t eventuate on its own.
This article originally appeared on The Conversation. Read the original article here.
1st September 2018 at 4:14 am
It is already happening in ORKNEY, SCOTLAND: http://www.emec.org.uk/press-release-worlds-first-tidal-powered-hydrogen-generated-at-emec/
30th August 2018 at 8:07 am
Korea Hydrogen, a new technology does exist and short easy search on Google, will provide pages of information on advances in hydrogen use other the Nasa’s rockets.
25th August 2018 at 8:40 am
Hydrogen and oxygen produced by electrolysis in a water reactor supplied by a solar DC current, Is the way to go, no working parts, does it all day long.
Stored in separate oxygen and hydrogen containers similar to the storage of coal gas in gasometers or maybe bladders like those used for transporting diesel on trucks, Also there is browns gas which is the combination of oxygen and hydrogen produce by electrolysis with out being separated. And can be sent directly to a petrol generator, this gas is highly volatile and would require an army ammunition storage shelter, to store it in.)
As oxygen and hydrogen are combined in a reactor, it produces electricity, this in effect makes a good way to store, potential DC electricity. These devices could be made to supply, houses that use solar DC power. easily, Another type of battery for use at nighttime.
Philip Edwards, Bellingen NSW.
24th August 2018 at 7:45 pm
My understanding is that the use of Hydrogen poses many safety risks due to it’s propensity to explode. NASA stops any and all space launches where there is any suspicion of a hydrogen leak. A Hydrogen leak completely destroyed the Challenger space shuttle. We all know about how when we place any commodity into general use by what one can describe as ordinary people; the majority will have no idea, understanding; of what those risks involve. There is no mention of these risks in these proposals; no mention of any new technology that will serve to mitigate the risks. Hydrogen leaks pose a dead end to the commercial use of Hydrogen gas as a commercial product replacement to the use of petrol in internal combustion engines. Period!
24th August 2018 at 3:49 pm
Using fossil fuels to produce hydrogen means no reduction in greenhouse gases overall. But solar and wind have a problem in being erratic; not good for supplying mains electricity above a fraction of the total demand. Erratic, per minute or per day would not be a problem for electrolysis; it could solve the problem.
Last I heard, carbon capture and storage was solid technology for storage but nowhere for capture. Storing non-greenhouse CO2 from brewing is logical as it has to be replaced by bad CO2 in the natural cycle; everything helps.
I would not put much planning on selling fuel to Japan. After recovering from the hysteria over Fukushima, they are going full bore on nuclear, including a new spent fuel reprocessing plant and planning a fast breeder reactor.